Legal rights of mojos

David Earley has written a useful post about the legal rights of people who film or video in public. It follows my post about police seizure of a mojo’s work in Sydney on December 23.


  1. Dave

    Hi Stephen,

    Thanks for the link! You may be aware, if you’ve read some of the conversations I linked to, that many people asked if Nick had been using Qik to live stream.

    He hadn’t, but it raises an interesting point, given the part of Stephen Blanks’ statement I highlighted - that once images are recorded, the police can’t delete or confiscate.

    How will this work for something like Qik, where the video is published live and streaming? For arguments sake, if the person recording *is* capturing something they shouldn’t be, are they going to suffer more serious charges because they have also already published, or broadcast, the content?

    I’ll let you know if I Qik video something work-related :)

  1. 1 A social media light-bulb moment « Koren Helbig’s blog

    […] It worked for Dave. (And, in a freaky turn of events, Stephen had highlighted Dave’s work on his own blog!) […]



Leave a Comment



*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image


  • Links via del.icio.us

  • Quinn's Flickr photos

    Newsplex

    Newsplex

    Newsplex

    Newsplex

    More Photos
  • Quinn's tweets