-
1
Pingback on Jan 16th, 2009 at 5:54 am
[…] It worked for Dave. (And, in a freaky turn of events, Stephen had highlighted Dave’s work on his own blog!) […]
A blog about how journalists worldwide use mobile phones for reporting, known as mojo or mobile journalism
[…] It worked for Dave. (And, in a freaky turn of events, Stephen had highlighted Dave’s work on his own blog!) […]
1 January 2009 at 8:31 am
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for the link! You may be aware, if you’ve read some of the conversations I linked to, that many people asked if Nick had been using Qik to live stream.
He hadn’t, but it raises an interesting point, given the part of Stephen Blanks’ statement I highlighted - that once images are recorded, the police can’t delete or confiscate.
How will this work for something like Qik, where the video is published live and streaming? For arguments sake, if the person recording *is* capturing something they shouldn’t be, are they going to suffer more serious charges because they have also already published, or broadcast, the content?
I’ll let you know if I Qik video something work-related